Peters township school district taxes8/25/2023 When that happens, it s in a development stage at best. 2 essentially testified to the initial assessment values noted above and provided testimony regarding the base year market values of several other properties which he believed were comparable to the subject property.4 In response to questioning by common pleas regarding the reassessment of the property following its sale to the Blazeks, Neil testified as follows: Historically, in the assessment office once a plan is filed, we re compelled to assign a parcel number to these lots. The last county-wide reassessment occurred in Washington County in 1981. Section 102 of the Assessment Law, 72 P.S. The base year is defined as the year upon which real property market values are based for the most recent county-wide revision of assessment of real property or other prior year upon which the market value of all real property of the county is based. Washington County uses the base year market value for assessment purposes. However, in arriving at actual value, a county may use either the current market value or adopt a base year market value. ยง 5453.602(a), real property shall be valued for assessment purposes according to its actual value. 3 Pursuant to Section 602(a) of the Assessment Law, 72 P.S. 2 The Uniformity Clause, found in Article VIII, Section 1 of the Pennsylvania Constitution, provides that, ll taxes shall be uniform, upon the same class of subjects, within the territorial limits of the authority levying the tax. The assessment and taxation of real estate in Washington County is also governed by The General County Assessment Law, Act of May 22, 1933, P.L. Before common pleas, the County placed its assessment record into evidence and presented the testimony of Robert Neil, its Chief Assessor. The Blazeks further appealed and a de novo hearing before common pleas followed. Application of the County s established predetermined ratio of. The lot was initially assigned a base year market value of $27,500 but that value was increased to $55,000 when the property was sold to the Blazeks, leading to a total base year market value of $388,232 (the market value of the improvements were $333,232).3 The Blazeks appealed their base year assessment and the Board of Assessment Appeals reduced the total base year market value of the property to $363,123 (reflected on the property record card as a reduction in the market value of the improvements to $308,123). 658 acre lot located at 1012 Sheriffs Court, McMurray, Peters Township. On appeal, this court must determine whether common pleas erred as a matter of law in concluding that Washington County s reassessment of the Blazek s lot after they purchased their newly constructed home from the developer violated the Fourth to Eighth Class County Assessment Law (Assessment Law)1 and the Uniformity Clause.2 The Blazeks own a 4,625 square foot home on a. McCULLOUGH, Judge HONORABLE JIM FLAHERTY, Senior Judge OPINION NOT REPORTED MEMORANDUM OPINION BY PRESIDENT JUDGE LEADBETTER FILED: DecemPeters Township and Peters Township School District (Tax Authorities) appeal from the order of the Court of Common Pleas of Washington County, sustaining the real estate tax assessment appeal of David G. 2010 Argued: NovemHONORABLE BONNIE BRIGANCE LEADBETTER, President Judge HONORABLE PATRICIA A. Blazek, husband and wife Washington County Board of Assessment Appeals, Peters Township and Peters Township School District : : : : : : : : : Appeal of: Peters Township and Peters Township School District : : v. IN THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA David G.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply.AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |